Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alan N. Webber's avatar

Boys, all your summaries were, once again, well written and interesting. Much more so than the album.

I never owned this album. I listened to a friend's copy when it came out in '78. Other than the powerful and unique Sir Duke, I didn't care for it back then. When my daughter was born in '81, I developed a liking for "Isn't She Lovely," although that wore out (the song) by the time daughter #2 came along. Maybe it was just the crying track on the beginning that sort of aligned with daughter #2's chronic colic - they seemed oddly similar. But the listening experience never inspired me to go out and buy the album, and I couldn't even finish it while writing this commentary - switched over to some Bad Company to cleanse my ears and pique my musical juices again.

I think Mitch's summary more closely aligned with my thoughts about the album, although we reached starkly different conclusions, much to my great surprise. The entire double album would be best reduced to a '45.

No guys, this doesn't belong on Newberry Street. It's too easy to get some material past you guys in my opinion. You don't seem to want to disappoint one anothers musical peccadilloes. If I had a vote, it would not exist on the hallowed halls of Newberry. Looking forward to the next one.

Expand full comment
Kevin Alexander's avatar

Ken wrote: "Listening to the entirety of Songs in the Key of Life leaves you a bit exhausted, or maybe that’s just me..."

No, it's not just you.

Maybe it's just the two of us, but for me, Key can be tiring as well. Partly because it's another album you're almost required to like, but also /because/ it is so revered as a cultural touchstone.

Listening to it can fell almost like an assignment, where you're supposed to be getting something life-changing out of it instead of just enjoying a good record.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts