Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Carl's avatar

So, so, so hard for me to say anything about this. KISS changed my life when I was 5. That said, I know exactly who/what they are. I don't defend them. I don't know why anyone would. The only thing I would probably disagree with is Mitch's "below average singing." In the 70s Paul Stanley was right up there with Robert Plant and Rob Halford. But if you're looking at KISS's singing OVERALL.....ok, probably average at best.

Expand full comment
Shaggy Snodgrass's avatar

Gotta disagree with all of you on this one. Bagging on KISS is easy, from the higher perch of 2023; where so very much water and great songs have gone under the bridge since 1977.

But listen.

If you throw 4 hard rock/heavy metal musicians into a room with their gear, no matter how complex and savage their own music projects are; after a few beers one of them's gonna play a KISS riff. Like "Black Diamond", or "Strutter", or "Mr. Speed". At least one more guy will pick up on it, and all will find their way into it. And they'll be having a massive amount of fun playing it.

That says something about them right there, that KISS was a formative musical influence far beyond most more "acceptable" and perfectly great bands of that era or since can ever claim. And that leaves all the other stuff, makeup, Pyro, controversy, capitalism, all of it outside that door.

The riffs have outlived, and will outlive, all else said or written about KISS.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts